PjM Project Management
Owner relationships, project planning, contracts, project execution, and quality control.
PjM Field Guide
Every topic covered for Project Management, written for the exam rather than the textbook. Tap any heading to open it.
01 Earned Value Management (EVM)
Core metrics
| Term | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| BAC | Original budget | Budget at Completion |
| PV | Planned Value for date | What was planned |
| EV | % complete × planned budget | Work earned (value) |
| AC | Actual Cost | What was spent |
Variances
| Variance | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| CV | EV − AC | Cost Variance (+ = under) |
| SV | EV − PV | Schedule Variance (+ = ahead) |
Performance indices
| Index | Formula | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| CPI | EV ÷ AC | 1.0 on budget; <1 over |
| SPI | EV ÷ PV | 1.0 on schedule; <1 behind |
Forecasting
| Forecast | Formula |
|---|---|
| EAC (Estimate at Completion) | BAC ÷ CPI (continuation at current rate) |
| ETC (Estimate to Complete) | EAC − AC |
| VAC (Variance at Completion) | BAC − EAC |
| TCPI | (BAC − EV) ÷ (BAC − AC), to meet BAC |
Action thresholds
- SPI/CPI 0.95–1.05: tolerance band
- SPI/CPI 0.85–0.95: investigate, plan action
- SPI/CPI <0.85: crisis intervention
Critical insight
% complete must be physical, not "% of effort spent." Otherwise CPI becomes meaningless.
02 Schedule Methods — CPM, PERT, Gantt
CPM (Critical Path Method)
- Deterministic (single duration estimates)
- Identifies critical path (longest path = project duration)
- Zero float on critical activities
- Most common for construction
PERT (Program Evaluation Review Technique)
- 3-point estimates: Optimistic + 4×Most Likely + Pessimistic, ÷ 6
- Probabilistic — useful when durations uncertain
- Common for R&D, new project types
Float (Slack)
- Total Float (TF) = LS − ES = LF − EF (can slip without delaying project)
- Free Float (FF) = ES(successor) − EF(predecessor) (can slip without delaying any successor)
- FF ≤ TF always
Schedule compression
| Method | Approach | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Crashing | Add resources to critical path | Cost increases |
| Fast-tracking | Overlap sequential activities | Rework if upstream changes |
Resource leveling
Smooths resource demand (may extend duration) — used when resources constrained.
AON vs AOA
- Activity-On-Node (modern, most software): activities at nodes, arrows show dependencies
- Activity-On-Arrow (older): activities on arrows, may need dummy activities for logic
Schedule baseline
Approved schedule used as benchmark. Changes require formal change control. Don't silently re-baseline — destroys variance integrity.
03 Risk Management Framework
Risk identification
Categories:
- External: market, regulatory, weather, geopolitical
- Internal: scope, schedule, budget, team, technical
Risk analysis
Probability × Impact = Risk Exposure
Heatmap or matrix to prioritize.
Risk response strategies
| Strategy | When |
|---|---|
| Avoid | High-risk, change scope/decline |
| Mitigate | Reduce probability or impact (QC, peer review) |
| Transfer | Shift to another party (insurance, subcontract) |
| Accept | Low impact or unavoidable (contingency budget) |
Risk Register
Living document with: ID, description, probability, impact, exposure, response strategy, response actions, owner, status, dates.
Contingency
- Schedule contingency: time buffer for known unknowns
- Cost contingency: budget buffer; design-stage typical 10-15%, construction 5-10%
- Management reserve: for unknown unknowns; controlled by sponsor
Common architectural project risks
- Scope creep: poorly defined scope, undocumented changes
- Coordination errors: discipline conflicts, BIM clashes
- Code interpretation: AHJ disagreement late in process
- Owner indecision: schedule slip
- Consultant default: missed deliverables
- Site conditions: geotechnical surprises
- Cost overrun: estimating gap, bid market
Risk culture
Open, blame-free identification. Issues hidden until crisis = catastrophic. Culture: "tell me bad news fast."
04 Project Roles & RACI
Architect team roles
| Role | Focus |
|---|---|
| PIC (Principal-in-Charge) | Senior accountability, contract authority, primary client rel |
| PM (Project Manager) | Scope/schedule/budget/team/comm — project's CEO |
| PA (Project Architect) | Technical lead, drawings/specs quality, coord, code |
| Designer | Concept, design quality through DD |
| Architects (staff) | Production, technical work |
| Interns/Designers I | Production under direct supervision |
RACI matrix
| Letter | Meaning |
|---|---|
| R | Responsible (does the work) — can be multiple |
| A | Accountable (owns outcome) — ONE per task |
| C | Consulted (provides input) |
| I | Informed (kept aware) |
Ambiguity about Accountable = top cause of project failure.
Stakeholders
Anyone affected by or influencing the project:
- Owner, end users, neighbors, AHJ, community groups
- Design team, contractors, suppliers
- Financiers, public
- Analyzed by interest × influence matrix
Stakeholder strategy
| Interest | Influence | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| High | High | Manage closely (frequent comm, decisions) |
| High | Low | Keep informed |
| Low | High | Keep satisfied |
| Low | Low | Monitor |
Decision Authority Matrix
Documents who decides what at what threshold:
- Owner-side: PM, executive sponsor, committee
- Architect-side: PA, PM, PIC
- Dollar thresholds for sign-offs
- Prevents decision delays
05 Project Phases & Deliverables
B101 Basic Services phases
| Phase | Deliverable | Approval |
|---|---|---|
| SD (Schematic Design) | Plans, elevations, sections; SD cost est | Owner approval to proceed |
| DD (Design Development) | Refined drawings, specs outline; DD cost est | Owner approval to proceed |
| CD (Construction Documents) | Permit-ready drawings + specs | Owner approval; bid |
| Bidding/Negotiation | Bid documents, evaluation, recommendation | Award |
| CA (Construction Administration) | RFIs, submittals, COs, observation, certification | Final completion |
Typical phase durations (%)
- SD ~15%
- DD ~20%
- CDs ~40%
- Bidding ~5%
- CA ~20%
Phase-end cost estimates
- SD: concept-level, may be ±20%
- DD: more detailed, ±10-15%
- CD 95%: close to bid, ±5-10%
Additional Services per B101 §4
NOT in Basic Services — separate fee:
- Programming, POE, LEED administration
- Renderings beyond standard presentation
- Existing facility surveys
- Detailed cost estimates beyond preliminary
- Coordination of Owner consultants
- Services after substantial completion
- Services made necessary by Owner changes to approved phase work
- G801/G802 documents amendments
Bidding/Negotiation deliverables
- Invitation to Bid
- Instructions to Bidders (A701)
- Bid Form
- Agreement form (A101)
- General Conditions (A201)
- Supplementary Conditions
- Drawings + Specs
- Addenda
- Bid evaluation + recommendation
06 Construction Administration Workflow
CA scope per B101 §3.6
- Site visits "at intervals appropriate" — generally familiar, not exhaustive
- Review submittals for general conformance with design intent
- Issue clarifications (RFIs) and minor changes (ASI)
- Certify payment applications
- Recommend Change Orders
- Initial Decision Maker (IDM) on claims by default
- Inspect for Substantial and Final Completion
Document flow
| Doc | Direction | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| RFI (G716) | Contractor → Architect | Clarification of CDs |
| Submittal | Contractor → Architect | Approval before fabrication |
| ASI (G710) | Architect → Contractor | Minor change, NO cost/time |
| CO (G701) | Three-way signed | Agreed cost/time change |
| CCD (G714) | Owner+Architect → Contractor | Direct work to proceed; cost TBD |
| Pay App (G702/G703) | Contractor → Architect → Owner | Monthly payment |
| Field Report | Architect → all | Observation documentation |
| G704 | Three-way signed | Substantial Completion |
| G707 | Surety → Owner | Consent to Final Payment |
Key timeframes (A201)
- Claim notice: 21 days from event or recognition
- Differing site conditions: 14 days
- Initial Decision: 30 days
- Mediation: required before binding dispute resolution
- Final payment: after Final Completion + lien waivers + closeout
Meeting cadence
- Pre-construction conference (before NTP)
- OAC meetings (weekly typical during active construction)
- Pre-installation conferences (for critical trades)
- Monthly Owner update (or per Owner preference)
Architect's safety position
Contractor SOLE responsibility for safety per A201 §10. Architect doesn't direct means/methods. Observed issues: bring to contractor's attention (often in writing for record), don't direct.
07 Project Initiation & Charter
Project Charter contents
- Project objectives + success criteria
- Scope summary (in and out of scope)
- Project sponsor (Owner senior authority)
- Project manager (with authority defined)
- Major milestones and target dates
- Budget summary
- Key stakeholders
- Initial high-level risks
- Approval authority levels
Concise (1-3 pages). Without Charter: PM lacks authority. With: clear basis for decisions.
Owner Initial Information (B101 §1)
- Project objectives
- Schedule expectations
- Budget
- Program description
- Site information
- Sustainability goals
- Procurement preference
- Special considerations
Becomes basis for design. Material changes after agreement may trigger Additional Services per §4.
Decision Authority Matrix
Owner-side:
- PM (operational decisions, $X threshold)
- Executive sponsor (strategic, larger $)
- Committee (above threshold)
Architect-side:
- PA (technical decisions)
- PM (project decisions within budget)
- PIC (contract, scope changes, major risks)
Documented and posted. Reduces escalation friction.
Project objectives (clarify upfront)
| Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Programmatic | Square footage, room count, function |
| Financial | Budget cap, ROI, life-cycle cost |
| Schedule | Substantial completion date, move-in |
| Quality | Materials level, design aspirations |
| Sustainability | LEED level, energy targets, materials |
| Process | Stakeholder engagement, transparency |
| Operational | Maintenance, durability, flexibility |
Conflicts inevitable — surface them early.
Kickoff meeting essentials
- Introductions (all stakeholders)
- Owner objectives review (validate understanding)
- Schedule baseline
- Communication protocols (single contact, frequency)
- Meeting cadence
- Decision authority confirmation
- Risk discussion
- Document deliverables
Stakeholder identification
- Owner (organization + reps)
- End users
- Neighbors / community
- AHJ (multiple — building, fire, health, etc.)
- Design team (architect + consultants)
- Contractors (when known)
- Financiers
- Regulators
Analyzed by interest × influence matrix to prioritize engagement.
Initial risk assessment
- Site risks (geotech, environmental, zoning)
- Owner risks (financing, decision-making, scope clarity)
- Schedule risks (regulatory approvals, lead times)
- Budget risks (market conditions, escalation)
- Technical risks (unusual systems, new technology)
Risk register established at initiation, updated throughout.
Critical success factors (CSFs)
What MUST go right for project to succeed:
- Identify 3-5 CSFs at initiation
- Monitor throughout
- Action plan if any CSF threatened
- Different from objectives (broader) — CSFs are operational requirements
08 Project Planning Deliverables
Project Management Plan (PMP)
Comprehensive plan covering all knowledge areas:
Subsidiary plans
- Scope Management: how scope defined, validated, controlled
- Schedule Management: tools, cadence, update process
- Cost Management: estimating, tracking, reporting
- Quality Management: QC procedures, acceptance criteria
- Resource Management: staffing, roles, allocation
- Communications Management: who/what/when/how
- Risk Management: identification, response, monitoring
- Procurement Management: consultants, contractor strategy
- Stakeholder Management: engagement strategy
- Change Management: how changes evaluated, approved
Created during Planning, updated through Execution. Larger projects more formal; small projects consolidated.
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
Hierarchical decomposition:
- Project → Phases → Deliverables → Work Packages → Activities
- 100% rule: each level sums to 100% of parent (nothing missed, nothing extra)
- Decomposition continues until work packages are 8-80 hours (rule of thumb)
- Foundation for scope, estimating, scheduling, responsibility assignment
RACI matrix
| Letter | Meaning |
|---|---|
| R | Responsible (does the work) — can be multiple |
| A | Accountable (owns outcome) — ONE per task |
| C | Consulted (provides input) |
| I | Informed (kept aware) |
Ambiguity about Accountable is the #1 cause of project failure.
Schedule baseline
- Approved schedule used as benchmark
- Updates compared to baseline = variance
- Changes require formal change control
- Don't silently re-baseline (destroys variance integrity)
Cost baseline
- Approved budget allocated by WBS / time
- Used for earned value analysis
- Changes via change control
- Contingency separate (held by PM or sponsor)
Communication plan
| Comm Type | Audience | Content | Frequency | Channel | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAC weekly | Owner, Architect, Contractor | Project status, RFIs, COs | Weekly | In-person/video | PM |
| Owner update | Owner exec sponsor | Milestones, issues | Monthly | PIC | |
| Internal team | Project team | Tasks, coordination | Weekly | In-person | PA |
| Community | Neighbors | Construction schedule | Phase-based | Mail/web | Owner |
Different stakeholders need different cadences and formats.
Risk register
Living document with:
- Risk ID
- Description
- Probability (1-5)
- Impact (1-5)
- Exposure (P × I)
- Response strategy (Avoid/Mitigate/Transfer/Accept)
- Response actions
- Owner
- Status
- Dates
Reviewed monthly minimum. New risks added; resolved risks closed.
Issue log
- Distinct from risk register (issues = actualized risks or other problems)
- Each issue: description, owner, action plan, status, target date
- Reviewed at OAC meetings
- Tracks resolution
Stakeholder register
- All stakeholders identified
- Interests, expectations, concerns
- Influence level
- Engagement strategy
- Designated relationship owner
Procurement plan
- Make-or-buy analysis
- Sub-consultant strategy (in-house vs outside)
- Contractor delivery strategy (DBB, DB, CMc, IPD)
- Bidder qualification process
- Schedule for procurement
09 Owner-Architect Agreement Management
B101 structure
- Article 1: Initial Information
- Article 2: Architect's Responsibilities
- Article 3: Scope of Architect's Basic Services (SD, DD, CD, B/N, CA)
- Article 4: Additional Services
- Article 5: Owner's Responsibilities
- Article 6: Cost of the Work
- Article 7: Copyrights & Licenses
- Article 8: Claims and Disputes
- Article 9: Termination or Suspension
- Article 10: Miscellaneous
- Article 11: Compensation
Basic Services (Article 3)
| Phase | Activities | Deliverables |
|---|---|---|
| SD | Concept, alternatives, preliminary | Plans, elevations, sections, cost est |
| DD | Refinement, systems decisions | Refined drawings, spec outline, cost update |
| CD | Complete documentation | Permit-ready drawings + specs |
| B/N | Bidding assistance | Bid evaluation, recommendation |
| CA | Construction administration | Site visits, RFIs, submittals, COs, certification |
Additional Services (Article 4) — separate fee
- Programming
- Site analysis and selection
- Existing facility surveys
- POE (Post-Occupancy Evaluation)
- LEED administration
- Renderings beyond standard presentation
- Detailed cost estimates beyond preliminary
- Coordination of Owner consultants
- Services made necessary by Owner changes after phase approval
- Services after substantial completion (extended CA)
G801 vs G802
| Doc | Use |
|---|---|
| G801 | Notice — alerts Owner that scope has changed and additional services are needed |
| G802 | Amendment — formal modification (scope, fee, schedule) |
Both critical for preserving right to additional fee. Failure to give timely notice can waive claim.
Fixed Limit of Construction Cost (§6.5)
If all bids exceed Fixed Limit, Owner options:
- Give written approval of increased Fixed Limit
- Rebid project (architect helps without additional fee)
- Revise scope (architect redesigns WITHOUT additional fee)
- Abandon project
The "redesign at no fee" is a major architect risk.
Suspension by Architect (§9.4)
- Owner non-payment 7+ days past due
- 7-day written notice + 7-day cure period
- Architect may suspend if not cured
- Cost adjustment + reimbursement of expenses
Termination by Architect (§9.2)
- Material breach by Owner (extended non-payment, failure of agreement on substantial change)
- Architect entitled to: fees for services performed + termination expenses + reasonable margin
Termination by Owner (§9.5)
- 7 days written notice for breach
- Immediate for convenience (with compensation)
- Architect compensation: services + termination + reasonable OH&P on unperformed work (if for convenience)
Copyright (§7)
- Architect retains copyright in instruments of service
- Owner gets non-exclusive license for THIS project
- License terminates on Owner default
- Architect may use for marketing, publications
Standard of Care (§2.2)
- Architect performs consistent with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by architects practicing in the same or similar locality under the same or similar circumstances
- NOT elevated (highest, best) — protects E&O coverage
Insurance (§2.5)
- Maintain stated minimums for: General Liability, Auto, Workers Comp, Professional Liability
- Project-specific limits Owner may require negotiated separately
- Continue coverage for stated period after substantial completion
10 Sub-Consultant Management
C401 — Architect-Consultant Agreement
Mirrors B101 — flows down architect's Owner obligations to consultant:
- Standard of care
- Insurance requirements
- Document standards
- Coordination obligations
- Schedule
- Payment
"Flow-down" prevents architect from owing Owner something the consultant doesn't owe.
Typical sub-consultants
| Discipline | Role |
|---|---|
| Structural Engineer (SE) | Building structural design |
| MEP Engineer | Mechanical, electrical, plumbing |
| Civil Engineer | Site grading, utilities, stormwater |
| Landscape Architect | Plantings, hardscape, irrigation |
| Geotech Engineer | Soils, foundations recommendations |
| Acoustician | Sound isolation, room acoustics |
| Lighting Designer | Specialty lighting design |
| AV / IT Consultant | Audiovisual, technology |
| Specifications Writer | Outside spec writing |
| LEED Consultant | Sustainability certification |
| Code Consultant | Complex code compliance |
| Cost Estimator | Independent cost validation |
| Fire Protection Engineer | Performance-based fire design |
| Vertical Transportation | Elevator design |
| Food Service Consultant | Commercial kitchen design |
| Curtain Wall Consultant | Façade engineering |
Coordination responsibilities (Architect)
- Define scope of each consultant's work
- Coordinate among consultants
- Coordinate with Owner-furnished items
- Manage payment
- Review deliverables for quality and fit
- Address performance issues per C401
Architect does NOT coordinate contractor means/methods or sub schedules (contractor responsibility).
Insurance from sub-consultants
- COIs required BEFORE work starts
- Professional liability, GL, auto, workers comp
- Limits per C401 (commonly $1M-$5M professional)
- Architect listed as additional insured (sometimes)
- Verified annually or per project
- Lapsed coverage = exposure flows to architect
Selection process
- RFP or direct selection
- Qualifications matter most
- References from prior projects
- Fee negotiated based on scope
- Multi-discipline firms simpler; specialty firms for unusual scopes
Owner's consultants
Sometimes Owner directly engages certain consultants:
- Cost estimator (independent of architect)
- Sustainability consultant
- Special-purpose (e.g., theatrical, acoustical)
- Code consultant
- Survey, geotech (typically Owner)
Coordination with these is Owner responsibility but architect engages with them. Architect coordinates them per B101 §3.1.2 (Additional Service if extensive).
Common issues
- Scope gap between consultants (who does what?)
- Late deliverables from sub
- Quality issues with sub work
- Sub doesn't follow architect's coordination
- Sub fee disputes
- Insurance lapse
Performance management
- Regular check-ins on schedule
- Review deliverables thoroughly
- Document issues in writing
- Escalate via C401 remedies if needed
- Consider replacement on chronic non-performance (disruptive, last resort)
Pay-when-paid considerations
- Architect typically pays consultants when paid by Owner
- Architect carries some risk if Owner doesn't pay
- Some architects pay consultants regardless to maintain relationships
- Document payment terms in C401
11 Procurement & Delivery Methods
Delivery method comparison
| Method | Description | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design-Bid-Build (DBB) | Sequential, separate contracts | Low cost focus, well-understood | Adversarial, no construction input during design |
| Design-Build (DB) | Single contractor + designer | Single point, faster | Owner has less design control |
| CMc (CM at Risk) | CM provides preconstruction + GMP | Cost certainty + design input | More complex contracting |
| CMa (CM Adviser) | CM advises but doesn't build | Independent advice | More fees |
| IPD (Integrated Project Delivery) | Multi-party collaborative contract | Shared risk/reward, deeply collaborative | Complex setup |
| Multi-prime | Owner contracts each trade | Lower cost on public work | Owner coordination |
DBB sequential process
- Architect designs (CD complete)
- Project bid (architect assists)
- Lowest responsive responsible bidder selected
- Construction (architect provides CA)
- Substantial completion → Final completion
DB process
- Owner defines criteria (program, performance specs)
- Design-Build entity bids on cost
- DB team completes design + construction
- Architect may be on DB team or Owner's reviewer
Owner's architect (if engaged) is "Architect of Record" or "Bridging Architect" — different role than typical B101.
CMc process
- Architect designs through SD/DD
- CMc engaged for preconstruction services
- CMc provides cost estimates, constructability input, schedule
- CMc proposes GMP (typically at end of DD)
- CDs completed
- CMc constructs at agreed GMP
- Savings below GMP per contract (Owner keeps, shared, etc.)
When each delivery method works
| Method | Best For |
|---|---|
| DBB | Defined scope, low-bid market, public works |
| DB | Complex/specialized buildings, schedule-driven |
| CMc | Mid-complexity, cost certainty needed, design input valuable |
| CMa | Owner wants independent advice without GMP |
| IPD | Major projects, mature Owners, deeply collaborative |
| Multi-prime | Public works in some states (required) |
Bidding process (DBB)
- Invitation to Bid: announces project, prequalification
- Pre-bid meeting: walk-through, Q&A
- Addenda: written modifications before bid
- Bid opening: usually public for public works
- Bid analysis: responsive, responsible, lowest
- Award recommendation: architect to Owner
- Contract execution
Bid evaluation criteria
- Responsive: complies with bid requirements
- Responsible: capable of performing (financial, experience, references, bonding)
- Lowest: financial comparison
- Both responsive AND responsible required
Sub-bidder list (sometimes)
- Subcontractor names submitted with bid
- Some jurisdictions require for public works
- Limits last-minute bid shopping
- Owner approval may be required for sub changes
Negotiated procurement
Alternative to bidding:
- Selected contractor based on qualifications
- Then negotiate scope/cost
- Used for: complex projects, repeat relationships, specialized work
- Public works often prohibited (low-bid required)
12 Schedule Management & EVM
CPM (Critical Path Method)
- Identify all activities + durations
- Establish dependencies (Finish-Start, etc.)
- Calculate Early Start, Early Finish, Late Start, Late Finish
- Critical path = longest path = project duration
- Zero total float on critical activities
- Any delay to critical activity = project delay
Float (Slack)
| Type | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Total Float (TF) | LS − ES = LF − EF | Slip without delaying project |
| Free Float (FF) | ES(successor) − EF(predecessor) | Slip without delaying successor |
FF ≤ TF always.
Schedule compression
| Method | Approach | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Crashing | Add resources to critical path | Cost increase |
| Fast-tracking | Overlap sequential activities | Rework risk |
EVM (Earned Value Management)
Core metrics
| Term | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| BAC | Original budget | Budget at Completion |
| PV | Planned Value for date | What was planned |
| EV | % complete × planned budget | Work earned (value) |
| AC | Actual Cost | What was spent |
Variances
| Variance | Formula | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| CV | EV − AC | + = under budget |
| SV | EV − PV | + = ahead schedule |
Performance indices
| Index | Formula | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| CPI | EV ÷ AC | 1.0 on budget; <1 over |
| SPI | EV ÷ PV | 1.0 on schedule; <1 behind |
Forecasting
| Forecast | Formula |
|---|---|
| EAC | BAC ÷ CPI (continuation) |
| ETC | EAC − AC |
| VAC | BAC − EAC |
| TCPI | (BAC − EV) ÷ (BAC − AC) |
Action thresholds
| Range | Action |
|---|---|
| SPI/CPI 0.95-1.05 | Tolerance band |
| SPI/CPI 0.85-0.95 | Investigate, plan action |
| SPI/CPI <0.85 | Crisis intervention |
EAC interpretation
CPI 0.85, BAC $1M → EAC = $1M ÷ 0.85 = $1.176M (18% over budget if trend continues).
Resource leveling
Smooths resource demand (may extend duration). Used when resources constrained (specialty engineer, equipment).
Reporting cadence
- Weekly: PM tracks for early signals
- Monthly: Owner reports
- Per milestone: detailed reviews
Schedule update process
- Contractor submits update (typically monthly)
- Architect reviews for general reasonableness
- OAC meeting reviews status
- Variance vs baseline discussed
- Recovery plans for slippage
Critical insight
% complete must be physical, not "% of effort spent." Otherwise CPI becomes meaningless and EVM is garbage in / garbage out.
CPM vs Agile
| Approach | When |
|---|---|
| CPM | Construction (well-defined, sequential) |
| Agile | Software development (iterative, exploratory) |
Architecture practice itself sometimes uses Agile concepts for design (sprints, retrospectives) but project execution typically CPM.
13 Quality Management in Projects
Quality definitions
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Quality Planning | What quality means for this project |
| Quality Assurance (QA) | System to deliver quality (process-focused) |
| Quality Control (QC) | Specific checks (inspection, testing) |
| Conformance to requirements | Meeting documented standards |
| Fitness for use | Performs intended function |
Quality during design
| Stage | QC Activity |
|---|---|
| SD | Concept compliance, code basics, cost alignment |
| DD | Detail development, coordination, cost verification |
| CD | Constructability, code compliance, completeness |
| Pre-bid | Final scrub of bid documents |
Reviewers
- Internal peer review (senior architects)
- Discipline coordination (overlay all)
- Code review (designated reviewer)
- Constructability review (builder perspective)
- Owner review at phase ends
- Third-party review (major projects)
- Specialist consultants (curtain wall, lighting, etc.)
QC during construction
- Submittal review (general conformance with design intent)
- Mock-ups (full-scale assembly validation)
- Field observation (site visits "at intervals appropriate")
- Field reports (documented observations)
- Testing & inspection (concrete, masonry, fire, etc.)
- Punch list (substantial completion inspection)
- Final inspection
Owner's testing
Many projects engage independent testing agency:
- Concrete cylinder breaks (typically 7-day, 28-day)
- Soil compaction
- Welding inspection
- Masonry strength
- Fire-stopping
- Air infiltration (blower door)
- HVAC balancing (TAB - Testing, Adjusting, Balancing)
- Commissioning (Cx)
Special Inspections (IBC Chapter 17)
Required by IBC for certain construction:
- Structural steel
- Welding
- Concrete (high-strength, post-tensioned)
- Masonry (some types)
- Seismic resistance
- Fire-resistant materials
- Smoke control
- Spray-applied fire protection
Owner engages Special Inspector (qualified independent). Reports to Owner, AHJ, architect.
Commissioning (Cx)
Fundamental Cx (LEED prereq):
- HVAC, lighting controls, hot water
- Design intent documented
- Installation verified
- Performance tested
- Owner training
- O&M documentation
Enhanced Cx:
- Expanded scope
- Longer monitoring (typically 10 months post-occupancy)
- Earlier engagement (during design)
- Re-commissioning at 1 year
Quality metrics
- Design errors found in QC (count, severity)
- RFIs per drawing (high = potential documentation issue)
- Change orders for design errors (count, $)
- Substantial completion punch list size
- 1-yr correction period claims
- Owner satisfaction scores
Lessons captured
- What worked
- What didn't
- Process improvements
- Standard updates
- Training needs
- Stored in firm knowledge base
14 Construction Administration — Architect Role
CA scope per B101 §3.6
- Site visits "at intervals appropriate to stage" — generally familiar with progress and quality
- Review submittals for general conformance with design intent
- Issue clarifications (RFIs) and minor changes (ASI)
- Certify payment applications
- Recommend Change Orders
- Initial Decision Maker (IDM) on claims by default
- Inspect for Substantial and Final Completion
CA is NOT
- Exhaustive inspection of all work
- Continuous on-site supervision
- Verification of contractor accounting
- Approval of means, methods, sequences
- Responsibility for safety
- Verification of contractor's quality control
These limitations protect architect from over-broad claims.
Document flow during CA
| Doc | Direction | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| RFI (G716) | Contractor → Architect | Clarification of CDs |
| Submittal | Contractor → Architect | Approval before fabrication |
| ASI (G710) | Architect → Contractor | Minor change, NO cost/time |
| CO (G701) | Three-way signed | Agreed cost/time change |
| CCD (G714) | Owner+Architect → Contractor | Direct work to proceed; cost TBD |
| Pay App (G702/G703) | Contractor → Architect → Owner | Monthly payment |
| Field Report | Architect → all | Observation documentation |
| G704 | Three-way signed | Substantial Completion |
| G707 | Surety → Owner | Consent to Final Payment |
OAC Meetings (Owner-Architect-Contractor)
- Weekly typical during active construction
- Agenda: schedule, RFIs, submittals, pay app, COs, issues, action items
- Minutes within 48-72 hours with 7-day correction period
- Distributed to all parties
- Critical for project documentation
Pre-construction conference
Held before NTP (Notice to Proceed):
- Communication protocols
- Submittal procedures
- Pay app process
- RFI process
- Change order process
- Safety (contractor's responsibility)
- Site rules
- Schedule expectations
- Meeting cadence
Documents tone and procedures for the project.
Pre-installation conferences
Before critical trades begin:
- Roofing, curtain wall, masonry, gypsum board, flooring
- Attendees: architect, contractor, subcontractor, manufacturer rep
- Review specs, mock-ups, coordination, quality expectations
- Documents minutes
Field observation reports
- Date, weather, attendees
- Work in progress observed
- Non-conformities noted
- Follow-up items
- Photos
- Distribution to all parties
- Documentation for project record
Architect's safety position
Contractor SOLE responsibility for safety per A201 §10.
- Architect doesn't direct safety means/methods
- Observed issues: bring to contractor's attention (often in writing for record)
- Don't assume direction of safety (creates exposure)
Pay application certification
Per A201 §9.4:
- Architect issues Certificate for Payment within 7 days of pay app receipt
- Certifies "to the best of architect's knowledge..."
- May reduce amount with notice to both parties + reasons
- NOT a guarantee — professional opinion only
Claim handling
- Per A201 Article 15
- Notice within 21 days
- Architect (IDM) initial decision within 30 days
- Mediation before binding resolution
- Architect remains impartial — not Owner's advocate
15 Project Closeout & Transition
Substantial Completion checklist (G704)
- Contractor's request for inspection
- Punch list attached
- Architect inspection (may add items)
- Final punch list with time-to-complete
- G704 signed by Owner, Architect, Contractor
- Certificate of Occupancy from AHJ
- Beneficial occupancy permitted
- Retainage reduced
- 1-year correction period begins
- Liquidated damages cease
- Owner property insurance replaces Builder's Risk
Final Completion checklist
- All punch list items resolved
- Record drawings (as-builts) compiled
- O&M manuals delivered and indexed
- Warranties collected (manufacturer + system)
- Owner training completed (sign-in sheets)
- Attic stock delivered
- Final cleaning verified
- Test reports complete (commissioning, balancing, etc.)
- Final lien waivers (unconditional) from all subs
- G707 Consent of Surety if bonded
- Affidavit of payment of debts (A201 §9.10.2)
- Architect's final certificate
- Final payment + retainage release
Owner deliverables to assemble
- Permits — final inspection signoffs
- Certificate of Occupancy
- Health Dept signoff (if applicable)
- Fire Marshal final
- Elevator certification
- LEED/sustainability documentation
- Insurance certificates
Architect's closeout duties
- Final certification of substantial and final completion
- Compiled record drawings transmittal
- Compiled O&M manuals transmittal
- Project closeout binder index
- Project archive (firm records)
- Lessons Learned capture
Common closeout problems
- Punch list not completed before final payment
- Missing manufacturer warranties
- O&M manuals incomplete or disorganized
- Record drawings not updated through final changes
- Subcontractor lien waivers missing
- Test reports late
- Owner training not scheduled
- Commissioning not finalized
Closeout schedule
Typical 30-90 days from substantial completion to final payment. Major projects can take longer. Active PM management essential.
Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE)
Optional Additional Service per B101:
- 6-12 months after move-in typically
- Owner satisfaction, building performance
- Lessons for future projects
- Identifies issues for warranty correction
- Valuable for firm marketing and continuous improvement
Warranty period management
- 1-year correction period (A201 §12.2)
- Active monitoring by Owner
- Issues identified to contractor
- Architect may assist (typically Additional Service after substantial completion)
- Some items may be deferred to seasonal testing (e.g., heating performance in winter)
Reference & marketing
- Owner permission for reference, photos, publication
- Coordinate with Owner PR
- Award submissions
- Case studies
- Photography during construction + at completion
Architect-Owner relationship transition
- Project complete but relationship continues
- Position for future work
- Newsletter, holiday cards, periodic check-ins
- Reference for new clients
- Repeat business potential
Firm internal review
After project complete:
- Financial performance (fee realized vs effort)
- Quality issues encountered
- Team performance
- Lessons learned
- Process improvements
- Update standards/templates
- Training opportunities identified
16 Conflict Resolution & Difficult Situations
Common project conflicts
| Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Scope disputes | What's included? Additional services? |
| Schedule conflicts | Realistic timelines? Causes of delays? |
| Budget overruns | Whose responsibility? Solutions? |
| Design vs cost | Aspirations vs reality |
| Owner indecision | Slow decisions, changing minds |
| Consultant performance | Late, low quality, or miscoordinated |
| Contractor disputes | Means, quality, change orders |
| Owner-Contractor friction | Architect caught in middle |
| Internal team friction | PA vs PM, design vs technical |
Conflict resolution approach
- Address early — small conflicts grow if ignored
- Understand positions vs interests — what they want vs why
- Listen actively — let parties be heard
- Identify common ground — usually exists
- Generate options — multiple solutions
- Evaluate against criteria — objective standards
- Document agreement — written follow-up
- Escalate when stuck — to PIC, senior leadership
Positions vs interests
Position: what someone says they want
Interest: underlying need or motivation
Multiple positions can satisfy same interest. Interests often align even when positions conflict.
Example:
- Position: "Contractor demands $50K change"
- Interest: Cost certainty, fair compensation
- Position: "Owner refuses to pay"
- Interest: Budget integrity, no surprises
- Common ground: Both want clear process, fair outcome
- Solution: Document basis, negotiate amount, formalize via CO
Win-win negotiation
- Focus on interests, not positions
- Multiple options before deciding
- Use objective criteria (industry standards, contract terms, fair market value)
- Separate the people from the problem
- Don't compromise on principles; compromise on terms
Owner indecision
Symptoms: changing direction, missed approvals, expanding scope, contradictory direction
Approach:
- Document decisions in writing
- Set clear deadlines for approvals
- Identify decision authority (single point of contact)
- Communicate impact of delays/changes
- Escalate to executive sponsor when stuck
- G801/G802 when scope expands
Sub-consultant non-performance
Symptoms: late, low quality, miscoordinated
Approach:
- Document specific issues in writing
- Performance discussion (face-to-face)
- Improvement plan with deadlines
- Escalate per C401 remedies (warning, withholding fee)
- Replacement (disruptive, last resort)
Contractor disputes
- Stay impartial (architect is IDM, not Owner's advocate)
- Document objectively
- Follow A201 procedures (claim → IDM → mediation → binding)
- Don't make snap decisions under pressure
- Consult counsel for significant disputes
Internal team friction
- Address through line management
- Clear role definitions (RACI)
- Team building investments
- Performance management
- Coaching individuals
- Sometimes role changes needed
Difficult conversations
- Schedule, don't ambush
- Private setting
- Direct but respectful
- Focus on specific behaviors/issues
- Listen to other perspective
- Document agreed actions
- Follow up
When to involve legal
- Anything affecting contract validity
- Disputed obligations
- Insurance claims
- Termination considerations
- Public-facing disputes
- IP issues
- Anything you're unsure about
Early counsel involvement = better outcomes typically.
17 Communication Hierarchies
Standard DBB communication paths
Owner ⇌ Architect ⇌ Contractor
↓
Subcontractors
↓
Sub-subs / Suppliers
Architect ↔ Consultants
Architect ⇌ Structural / MEP / Civil / etc.
Architect ↔ Contractor (during construction)
Architect ⇌ Contractor
(NOT directly to subs)
Modified paths
CMa (CM as Adviser)
Owner ⇌ Architect ⇌ CM (advisor) ⇌ Contractors (multiple, separately)
- CM advises Owner on cost/schedule
- Owner holds multiple prime contracts
- Architect coordinates with all
CMc (CM as Constructor)
Owner ⇌ Architect ⇌ CMc ⇌ Trade Contractors
- CMc is the "contractor" essentially
- Architect still works for Owner
- Communications similar to DBB
Design-Build
Owner ⇌ Design-Builder ⇌ Architect (employed/consulted by DB)
- Owner has one contract — with Design-Builder
- Architect typically works for Design-Builder
- No direct privity between Owner and Architect
Documents that establish communication
- Owner-Architect agreement (B101) — Owner ↔ Architect
- Owner-Contractor agreement (A101) — Owner ↔ Contractor
- General Conditions (A201) — Triangle communication, formal procedures
- Owner-Consultant agreements — Direct or through architect
- Architect-Consultant agreements (C401) — Architect ↔ Consultant
When direct communication is acceptable
- Owner directly speaking to anyone (architect should know)
- Architect directly speaking with sub for technical clarification (rare; CC the contractor)
- Emergency situations (notify all immediately)
- Specific carve-outs in supplementary conditions
Communication best practices
- Single point of contact per organization
- Written records of significant communications
- Distribute meeting minutes within 48 hours
- Correction period (typically 7 days) — minutes stand if not corrected
- Use AIA forms when applicable
- Establish protocols at preconstruction meeting
18 Project Manager Toolkit
Key documents
- Project charter / kickoff document
- Work plan — scope breakdown
- Schedule (CPM, Gantt, milestone)
- Fee budget / staffing plan
- Risk register
- RACI matrix (responsibility chart)
- Meeting agendas & minutes
RACI levels
- R = Responsible (does the work)
- A = Accountable (owns outcome; only ONE)
- C = Consulted (input provider)
- I = Informed (kept aware)
Project lifecycle phases
- Initiating — charter, stakeholders
- Planning — scope, schedule, fee, risk
- Executing — production, coordination
- Monitoring & Controlling — track, adjust
- Closing — closeout, debrief, archive
Documentation discipline
- Distribute minutes within 48 hours
- Allow correction period (usually 7 days)
- If not corrected → record stands
- Keep an issue log
- Track decisions with dates and authority
19 Earned Value Management
Three core values
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PV (Planned Value) | Budgeted cost of work scheduled |
| EV (Earned Value) | Budgeted cost of work performed |
| AC (Actual Cost) | Actual cost of work performed |
Variances
- Schedule Variance: SV = EV − PV
- Positive: ahead of schedule
- Negative: behind schedule
- Cost Variance: CV = EV − AC
- Positive: under budget
- Negative: over budget
Performance indices
- CPI = EV / AC (cost performance)
- 1.0 = on budget
- \>1.0 = under budget
- <1.0 = over budget
- SPI = EV / PV (schedule performance)
- 1.0 = on schedule
- \>1.0 = ahead
- <1.0 = behind
Forecasting (EAC = Estimate at Completion)
- If CPI continues: EAC = BAC / CPI
- If on track from here: EAC = AC + (BAC − EV)
20 Schedule Analysis
CPM essentials
Forward pass (calculate ES, EF)
- Start at beginning
- ES = max(EF of all predecessors)
- EF = ES + duration
Backward pass (calculate LS, LF)
- Start at end
- LF = min(LS of all successors)
- LS = LF − duration
Float
- Total Float = LS − ES = LF − EF
- Free Float = ES of successor − EF (typically)
Relationship types
- FS — Finish-to-Start (most common)
- SS — Start-to-Start
- FF — Finish-to-Finish
- SF — Start-to-Finish (rare)
Modifiers
- Lag — required DELAY (concrete cure time)
- Lead — permitted OVERLAP (start framing before foundation done)
Acceleration techniques
- Crashing — add resources, $$
- Fast-track — overlap activities, risk
- Re-sequence — change relationships
- Reduce scope — Owner agreement
Schedule documentation
- Baseline schedule (locked at start)
- Updates (typically monthly)
- Recovery schedule (if late)
- Time impact analysis (delay claims)
21 AIA Contracts
Owner-Architect (B-series)
| Doc | Use |
|---|---|
| B101 | Standard, full services |
| B102 | Without scope (paired with B2xx) |
| B103 | Large/complex projects |
| B104 | Limited scope |
| B105 | Residential / small commercial |
| B106 | Pro Bono services |
Architect-Consultant
C401 — Mirrors B101 terms; flows down responsibilities to consultants.
22 Basic Service Phases
Five B101 phases
- Schematic Design (~15%)
- Design Development (~20%)
- Construction Documents (~40%)
- Bidding/Negotiation (~5%)
- Construction Administration (~20%)
Basic vs. Additional Services
Basic (included in fee): The five phases above.
Additional (separate fee):
- Programming
- POE
- LEED administration
- Renderings, models, fly-throughs
- Services made necessary by Owner changes
- Civil, landscape design (typically)
- Existing facility surveys
23 Schedule Management
CPM essentials
- Critical Path — longest sequence of dependent activities; defines project duration
- Float (slack) — time activity can slip without delaying project
- Lag — required DELAY between activities
- Lead — permitted OVERLAP between activities
Relationships
- FS — Finish-to-Start (most common)
- SS — Start-to-Start
- FF — Finish-to-Finish
- SF — Start-to-Finish (rare)
Schedule types
- Gantt (bar) — visual; weak on dependencies
- CPM diagram — shows dependencies, critical path, float
- Milestone — key dates only
- Pull-planning — Last Planner; team builds backwards
24 Fee Structures
Five common structures
- Stipulated sum (lump sum): Fixed fee
- Hourly: Per hour, often with not-to-exceed
- Percentage of construction cost: Traditional
- Cost plus fee: Reimbursable + fixed/percentage fee
- Unit cost: Per SF, per bed, per room
Trade-offs
Fixed: Owner has cost certainty. Architect bears scope creep risk.
Hourly: Architect protected from scope creep. Owner bears cost risk.
25 Risk Provisions
Critical B101 provisions
- Waiver of consequential damages — both parties waive lost profits, lost revenue claims
- Standard of care — ordinarily exercised by profession locally
- Limitation of liability — caps damages at fee or specific amount
- Indemnification — limited-form mutual; only own negligent acts
Statutes
- Statute of limitations — time to file after discovery (typ. 3-6 yrs)
- Statute of repose — absolute time after substantial completion (typ. 6-15 yrs by state)
Study PjM the way it's tested
Reading is the start. An account adds 365 spaced-repetition flashcards, 180 practice questions, and 3 timed mock exams for PjM — plus the other five divisions, synced across web, iOS, and Android.
Start your 7-day free trialThe other five divisions
Every plan includes all six. Study them in any order.